TRI-STAR 18 Study Plans 20.00 | |
TRI-STAR 18 Plans 175.00 |
Tri-star 25.
TRI-STAR 25 Study Plans $40.00 Add To Cart TRI-STAR 25 Plans $550.00 Add To Cart
Tri-star 27-9, tri-star 31, tri-star 31 cm.
TRI-STAR 31CM Study Plans $40.00 Add To Cart TRI-STAR 31CM Plans $600.00 Add To Cart
TRI-STAR 32XR Study Plans $40.00 Add To Cart TRI-STAR 32XR Plans $600.00 Add To Cart
TRI-STAR 35 Study Plans $ 40.00 Add To Cart TRI-STAR 35 Plans $ 650.00 Add To Cart
TRI-STAR 35 XR Study Plans $40.00 Add To Cart TRI-STAR 35 XR Plans $700.00 Add To Cart
Tri-star 37 xrc.
TRI-STAR 37 XRC Study Plans $ 40.00 Add To Cart TRI-STAR 37 XRC Plans $ 800.00 Add To Cart
Tri-star 40 lw, tri-star 42, tri-star 43 xrc, tri-star 43 mc, tri-star 44 lw, tri-star 45, tri-star 49, tri-star 50, tri-star 51 mc, tri-star 54, tri-star 60 / 63, tri-star 65, tri-star 80, tri-star 104.
Email us for availability and prices
The leen 56 combines all the advantages of the travel yacht, dynamic appearance, outstanding seaworthiness and optimised interior volume. this trimaran exudes balance and serenity., photos and videos, leen 56 exterior.
Leen 56 launch, leen-trimarans launch, air conditioning on board, leen 56 guided tour, worldwide launch leen 56, leen 56 video, cooling on board, specifications.
Privacy overview.
The 210 Sunreef Power Trimaran is the avant-garde of superyacht design and the ultimate expression of engineering expertise. An ambitious 210ft three-hulled concept, it fully utilizes the space within and between the hulls to reach a living area of nearly 1000m². The vessel’s outdoor social area features an immense flybridge, a cockpit opening onto the saloon as well as terraces at the front and aft.
The power trimaran’s upper deck features an aft terrace giving access to a grand dining room, an internal navigation station, a gym space, and the captain’s cabin. The main deck stretches over 510m² of entirely customizable surface. The saloon features a main lounging space placed amidships and four relaxing scenic areas with floor to ceiling glass windows.
The optional layout comprises six guest cabins, all fitted with large double beds, each facing retractable private balconies. The primary tender for up to 12 is stowed in the foredeck along with the crew dinghy. Placed forward is the stately master suite with panoramic widows, twin dressing rooms, an office and access to a private front terrace.
The lower level of the 210 Sunreef Power Trimaran is entirely devoted to the crew. Accessed through the water toys garage storing two jets skis and sea bobs, the central hull houses a fully equipped galley, dining and sleeping quarters, a laundry and large storage areas. All three levels of the trimaran are connected via an elevator and a spiral staircase.
For more information about the 210 Sunreef Power Trimaran, reach out to our customer representatives today.
Advanced composites
Construction
64 m / 210 Ft
Length overall
23.5 m / 77.1 Ft
Beam overall
Sunreef Yachts
Naval architecture
4 x 1635 HP
1.6 m / 5.41 Ft
Displacement
BARCHE | 2019-04
Boote Exclusiv | 2015-11
SuperYacht International - Summer 2015 | 2015-09
Boat International | 2014-03
Yachts Emirates | 2014-03
Yachts Croatia | 2014-01
Comments are closed.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
Copyright © 2024 Sunreef Yachts . All rights reserved.
Sunreef Venture S.A.
Sunreef Yachts Shipyard
ul. Tarcice 6
80-718 Gdańsk, Poland
+48 58 769 77 77
Your source for the latest news on yachts, boats and more. Read through our articles to find out how to compare boats and find the right fit for you!
Dec 06, 2023
less than a min
Power Catamarans, often termed as the epitome of modern maritime engineering, are gaining popularity for all the right reasons. Their distinct design, enhanced stability, and cruising efficiency set them apart from traditional monohull boats and even their sail-driven counterparts. This guide dives into the world of Power Catamarans, shedding light on their advantages and how they compare to other vessels like monohulls and trimarans.
The concept of catamarans traces its roots back to ancient maritime cultures. However, the power catamaran is a relatively modern innovation that marries the traditional twin-hull design with powerful engines, offering a unique blend of speed, stability, and space.
Power Catamarans are characterized by their twin hulls, which significantly reduce the drag, thus enhancing speed and fuel efficiency. Unlike monohulls, they have a broader beam, which contributes to increased stability and more living space. The absence of a ballast for stability further lightens the vessel, contributing to its speed and fuel economy
One of the significant advantages of power catamarans is their speed and handling. The twin hulls allow for a smoother glide over the water, making them particularly favorable for watersports enthusiasts. Their handling in rough waters is superior to monohulls, thanks to the inherent stability provided by the dual-hull design.
The stability of power catamarans is unparalleled, especially when compared to monohulls. The wide beam and twin hulls provide a stable platform, reducing the rocking and rolling common in monohulls. This stability is not only comforting in rough seas but also crucial when docking or anchoring.
The spacious design of power catamarans offers homelike livability, with ample room for cabins, lounges, and even onboard amenities like grills and bars. The wide beam also allows for large deck spaces, ideal for sunbathing or enjoying the scenic ocean vistas.
Power catamarans are economical, with fuel efficiency being one of their selling points. The redundancy built into their design, with separate engines for each hull, provides an added layer of safety, ensuring that the vessel can return to shore even if one engine fails.
Power catamarans, given their unique design and structure, come with their own set of maintenance requirements. Like all boats, routine checks and upkeep are essential to ensure smooth sailing. The twin hull design means double the underwater gear – from propellers to rudders, which necessitates regular inspections for any signs of wear, tear, or fouling.
Given that power catamarans have a larger surface area underwater due to their twin hulls, they may be more susceptible to marine growth. Regular antifouling treatments can help in keeping the hulls clean, ensuring optimal performance and fuel efficiency.
One distinct advantage of power catamarans is their dual-engine setup, but this also means double the engine maintenance. Regular oil changes, cooling system checks, and filter replacements are crucial. It's beneficial to synchronize maintenance schedules for both engines to ensure consistent performance.
The lifespan of a power catamaran largely depends on its build quality, materials used, and how well it's maintained. With proper care, a power catamaran can last for several decades. The engine's maintenance significantly impacts the catamaran's lifespan, with gasoline engines requiring maintenance at 1,200 to 1,800 hours and diesel engines at around 5,000 hours. The construction materials play a crucial role; for instance, fiberglass catamarans, when well-maintained, can last for many decades, while aluminum cats might change ownership after 10-15 years but can last a lifetime with proper care.
The power catamaran sector boasts several reputable manufacturers such as Lagoon, Leopard Catamarans, Fountaine Pajot, and other notable names like Seawind Catamarans.
Lagoon, a revered name under the Beneteau Group umbrella, has carved its niche in crafting luxurious, spacious catamarans. A prime example is the Lagoon 630 Motor Yacht, embodying opulence with its nearly 250 sq. ft. aft deck and 900 sq. ft. interior, comfortably housing up to 12 guests. Known for its superyacht styling, it boasts superior fuel efficiency and a commendable average velocity-made-good of 9 knots.
Emerging from the reputable Robertson and Caine shipyard in South Africa, Leopard Catamarans is synonymous with innovation and efficiency. The Leopard 53 Powercat is a testament to this legacy, showcasing excellent seakeeping abilities, offering 3 or 4 cabin configurations, and achieving a top speed of 25 knots.
A trailblazer since 1976, Fountaine Pajot constantly redefines catamaran design. The Fountaine Pajot MY6 is a shining example, encapsulating the brand's visionary ethos. Stretching 15 meters, the MY6, equipped with dual engines of up to 2 x 353 Kw and 2 x 480 hp, promises dynamic sailing. Crafted meticulously by Pier Angelo Andreani, the interior mirrors a 20-meter monohull's spaciousness, reflecting modern aesthetics and comfort that stand as a benchmark in the Motor Yacht world.
These manufacturers continue to innovate, offering a blend of luxury, performance, and efficiency in their power catamaran models, making them a popular choice among maritime enthusiasts.
While monohulls are traditional and often cheaper, they lack the stability and space offered by power catamarans. On the other hand, trimarans, with three hulls, provide even more stability but at the cost of additional drag and less interior space.
If you’re looking to delve deeper into the world of power catamarans and other vessels, TheBoatDB offers a comprehensive boat database. Explore various catamaran models, compare them with monohulls, trimarans, and other types of boats, and make an informed decision on your next maritime adventure.
In summary, power catamarans encapsulate a modern engineering marvel in the maritime domain. Their blend of speed, stability, comfort, and economy makes them an attractive option for a broad spectrum of boaters. Whether you are a long-distance cruiser, a water sport enthusiast, or someone who cherishes the tranquility of the sea, a power catamaran could be the vessel that transforms your maritime adventures into unforgettable experiences.
Aug 24, 2022
Feb 10, 2023
Oct 04, 2021
Oct 01, 2021
Design & performance.
This remarkable sailing trimaran stands out with its new innovative wave-piercing main hull design, ensuring smooth and efficient sailing. With a strong emphasis on easy handling and shorthanded sailing, the DRAGONFLY 36 is perfect for families and sailing enthusiasts alike.
Step aboard and experience the spacious cockpit that invites relaxation and social interaction, complemented by a stylish, modern interior that seamlessly blends comfort and practicality. This exceptional cruiser/racer sets a new standard for offshore sailing, prioritizing both safety and family-friendly features, making it an ideal choice for unforgettable voyages.
Join the next generation of sailors with the DRAGONFLY 36, where performance meets elegance and every journey becomes a memorable adventure.
The new DRAGONFLY 36 Performance Cruiser, a cutting-edge sailing trimaran where innovative design seamlessly integrates with exceptional functionality, all specifically engineered for those who crave adventure on the open seas. This remarkable cruiser/racer has been meticulously crafted for both seasoned sailors and adventurous families, standing out with its pioneering wave-piercing main hull and float design. This unique feature not only enhances the DRAGONFLY 36's aesthetics but also significantly boosts its performance by more buoyancy in the bow and also allowing for more smooth, safe and efficient sailing, even when navigating through choppy waters or adverse weather conditions.
The unique and revolutionary DRAGONFLY SWING WING system – introduced 35 years ago – reduces the 8.12 m beam to only 3.7 m in seconds, using no tools. The DRAGONFLY 36 introduces for the first time an all-composite high-tech construction, making the DRAGONFLY SWING WING system simpler, lighter, stronger and easier to maintain.
The DRAGONFLY 36 steps into a new era in construction and design at Quorning Boats in Denmark, where more composite engineering is implemented in the structural design. Many fine element calculations backed up with physical strength tests to ensure a stronger and homogeneous construction by also using more infusion and complex tooling for the composite parts. All this to optimize production, weight, strength, lifetime and maintenance and at the end also for lower costs. The DRAGONFLY 36 has been over 2 years in development and is a high tech quality construction in all details.
The DRAGONFLY 36 is engineered to excel in a variety of sailing scenarios, from spirited weekends on the water to long-distance offshore cruising. With its lightweight construction and expertly calibrated sail plan, this cruiser is designed for easy handling—making shorthanded sailing accessible and enjoyable. Whether you’re a solo sailor, a couple, or a family of four, the DRAGONFLY 36 simplifies the sailing process, allowing you to focus on the thrill of the adventure rather than the complexities of handling.
The DRAGONFLY 36 will be available in two versions, both with carbon masts. The TOURING version with self-tacking jib system and the PERFORMANCE version with a taller rig and larger overlapping furling headsail.
Step aboard and immerse yourself in the spacious cockpit, an inviting area designed for relaxation, social interaction, and enjoying the breath-taking views. Featuring comfortable seating with all lines and sail-handling-gear lead towards the twin helm wheels, without interrupting the people relaxing in front. The cockpit becomes a centerpiece for shared laughter and memorable experiences as you sail together with family and friends.
The modern, stylish standard ash (optional elm) interior has been carefully thought out to incorporate both comfort and practicality, with features like a fully equipped galley, multifunctional living spaces, and extensive natural light flooding through the boat. The design encourages a sense of togetherness, whether you’re preparing a meal or sharing a sunset view over a glass of your favorite beverage.
The onboard experience is enhanced by storage solutions and an ergonomic layout, allowing for a clutter-free environment. This attention to detail extends to the interior finishes, where high-quality materials meet aesthetics, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere that makes you feel at home, no matter where your journey takes you.
Join the next generation of sailors with the DRAGONFLY 36 Performance Cruiser. Whether embarking on a spontaneous day sail or planning an exhilarating long distance voyage, this sailing Trimaran redefines the standard for performance cruising, empowering you to explore the beauty of the open water with confidence, comfort, and unparalleled style. Experience a sailing lifestyle that goes beyond mere transportation, as each moment aboard the DRAGONFLY 36 becomes a cherished memory waiting to be created.
Dragonfly 36 touring and -performance.
Comming up...
SPECIFICATIONS DRAGONFLY 36 | TOURING | PERFORMANCE |
---|---|---|
LOA sailing | 11.55 m | 11.55 m |
LWL, centre hull | 10.90 m | 10.90 m |
Length folded | 13.43 m | 13.43 m |
Beam sailing | 8.12 m | 8.12 m |
Beam folded | 3.70 m | 3.70 m |
Draft, board up | 0.67 m | 0.67 m |
Draft, board down | 2.00 m | 2.00 m |
Weight of standard dry boat, sail ready excluding extra's | 4.500 kg | 4.500 kg |
Max total weight, all included incl. crew | 6.700 kg | 6.700 kg |
Max total weight, all included, excl. crew | 6.000 kg | 6.000 kg |
Water capacity | 200 l | 200 l |
Fuel tank | 90 l | 90 l |
Holding tank | 60 l | 60 l |
Engine, standard | 30/21.3 HP/kW | 30/21.3 HP/kW |
Engine, optional | 40/29.4 HP/kW | 40/29.4 HP/kW |
Mast section, carbon | 16.50 m | 18.50 m |
Mainsail | 60 m² | 70 m² |
Self-tacking jib | 20 m² | (25) m² |
Furling genoa | (30) m² | 38.5 m² |
Furling Code-0 | 60 m² | 72.5 m² |
Gennaker | 110 m² | 150 m² |
Bowsprit, fixed length | 0.90 m | 0.90 m |
Max. No of persons for CE-Category B | 5 | 5 |
Max. No of persons for CE-Category A | 7 | 7 |
Unsinkable | Yes | Yes |
Dragonfly 25
The Dragonfly 25 is a high-performance trailer-sailer, easy handling for camping- and racing sailors looking for an exhilarating lightweight trimaran which retains comfortable accommodation for weekend cruising with family and friends.
Dragonfly 28
The Dragonfly 28 sets new standards for the possibilities of a sailing boat. The perfect boat does not exist - but the Dragonfly 28 is very close to this ideal. The Dragonfly 28 comes in two versions, the Dragonfly 28 Touring version and the Dragonfly 28 Performance version.
Dragonfly 32
This Dragonfly 32 comes in a modern and dynamic design - setting new standards in both function and design. The perfect combination between family cruising and racing - also offshore. Explore your dreams!
Find your local dealer
Skærbækvej 101 7000 Fredericia Denmark
+45 7556 2626
VAT No DK 18 88 83 78
Dragonfly 40
Create a notification for Buyer's guide
We will keep you posted on new articles on this subject.
Published 28/10/2022
By Emmanuel van Deth
Issue: SP19
Published: dec. / jan. 2023
Issue #: SP19
Published: December / January 2023
A dismantlable powercat can be transported on a simple flatbed trailer... as long as it is of reasonable length and light in weight. Naval architect Richard Woods was able to test the validity of the concept with his own Skoota 28: the Aegean 30 is a development of the Skoota 28, still for building in plywood/epoxy and dismantlable. The objective was to increase the beam - now close to that of a sailing catamaran - and the headroom while offering two additional berths in the hulls. The outboard motors make beaching easier and safer - no rudders and engine legs. Two 40 to 60 HP engines guarantee a cruising speed of 10-12 knots (16-20 knots top speed).
Architect: Richard Woods Design Material: Epoxy plywood Overall length: 30’2” (9.20m) Waterline length: 289’ (8.85 m) Beam: 16’5” (5.00 m) Draft: 14” (0.36 m) Headroom in nacelle: 6’3” (1.90 m) Light displacement: 5,500 lbs (2.5 t) Laden displacement: 7,000 lbs (3.2 t) Engines: 2 x 40 to 60 HP outboards Cruising speed: 10/12 knots Max speed: 16/20 knots
Amateur or professional construction in plywood/epoxy.
New Zealand-based naval architecture firm Dan Leech is offering a number of power multihulls from 25 to 60 feet (7.5 to 18 m) for amateur or professional construction. Among them, the L925 is the perfect choice for relaxed cruising for a couple. This model is built in ½” (12 mm) plywood - the panels can be digitally cut - with glass/epoxy reinforcements. Its limited beam will allow you access to a marina slip without any noticeable extra cost. On the other hand, the gain in habitability and stability is considerable compared to a single-hulled motorboat. This kind of construction is very accessible to an enlightened amateur (4,000 hours of work were counted for the first model) all the more so as having outboard motors for propulsion considerably simplifies the technical aspects. Despite its semi-displacement hulls, the L925 is capable of making more than 20 knots with two 90 hp engines.
Construction: Amateur or professional Architect: Dan Leech Naval Architect Length: 30’4” (9.25 m) Waterline length: 24’9” (7.55 m) Beam: 11’ (3.35 m) Draft: 19” (0.48 m) - engines up Recommended engines: 2 x 90 HP outboards Cruising speed: 17 knots Max speed: 22 knots Fuel: 79 US gal (300 l)
Compact but luxurious.
The ArrowCat 320 is a successful model - now in its third generation. The smallest of the Arrowcat range, it features a luxurious finish - rare in compact powercats - such as a wooden steering wheel, or modern, full instrumentation on a carbon-look dashboard. Inside, the manufacturer has paid particular attention to the owner’s cabin. The 320 is powered by two outboard motors. The limited beam of 10 feet (3.05 m) allows the boat to be transported by road in certain countries such as the United ...
Subscribe to Multihulls World and get exclusive benefits.
Tags :
What readers think.
Post a comment
No comments to show.
MW #197 - Oct / Nov 2024
The latest news from €3 / month
Our latest YouTube hit!
The 2024 results
Vous avez ajouté " " à vos favoris., vous avez supprimé " " de vos favoris., in order to add this article to your favorites, please sign in..
QUESTION: If I build a multihull with straight sides of plywood to make construction easier, how much performance would I lose compared to a more ideal shape?
Now let's compare that to the shape with a semi-circular bottom that has the least wetted surface. Superimposed, the two might look like this (picture on right). Although I might refer to this simple shape as 'a Vee-hull', the shape I prefer actually has a little wider flat bottom in order to provide useful buoyancy lower down - see later. See also the article on relative virtues of flat panel shapes .
Right away, for the same displacement, one can see that the boxy hull has more draft, is narrower at the waterline but will have more underwater (wetted) surface. In practice, the Vee hull is likely to be 10% heavier in construction, but that might only mean say 5% required increase in overall displacement as the deadweight (crews, supplies etc.) could double the dry weight.
Now we need to look at how a boat's resistance varies with its speed and this is much related to its length. About 140 years ago, a William Froude discovered that up to a Speed/Length ratio (SLR)* of about 1, resistance is mostly made up of frictional resistance and in such a case, would be directly proportional to the wetted surface. From a SLR of 1 to about 2 (for a typical multihull), there's an increase in hull resistance due to waves made by the hull through the water, and the wetted surface resistance, although still there, takes a more minor role.
Once over a SLR of about 3.0, the wetted surface is again on the increase (although wave resistance is still significant). So for different boat lengths, here are the speeds we are talking about.
16' 20' | 4.00 4.47 | 12.00 13.42 |
*SLR = speed (in knots) divided by the square root of Waterline Length (ft)
So, below the speed given for SLR=1 and above the speed given for SLR=3.0, the majority of resistance would be directly affected by the roughly 20% increase in the wetted surface for the Vee (or 15% for the Box shape) and if we add in the 5% weight penalty, this could go to about 24%. ( While these percentages might also apply for speeds well under SLR of 0.5 or over 3.5, they would in fact be somewhat less than that at the SLRs listed, as not all the resistance would be due to surface friction )
But between the two values listed, wave resistance grows to a peak at around SLR=2 (for the average multihull) and at this point, the narrower beam of the Vee hulls could lower wave resistance enough to offset the frictional resistance and therefore be quite efficient in the range between the two speeds listed above for each length. The box or Vee'd shape would also offer less leeway and that will also help to compensate.
If we widen the hull at the bottom, the sides can become more vertical and this more box-like section can further lower the wave-making compared to the Vee-section we started out with, as it disturbs the passing waves even less.
Of course, there are other aspects to consider too—like having less interior space at the waterline with the V-hull and also, that the V-hull would initially sink about 15% more for each 100 lbs of extra weight loaded on. The extra draft of a Vee hull is sometimes used as a longitudinal keel to resist lateral drift and that 'might' annul the need for a dagger board or centerboard, although deep fins are clearly more efficient for sailing upwind.
But if you're content to sail in the speed range indicated by the table, which is surprisingly broad, and can accept the other compromises, there's definitely a case for using the box hulls and keeping it simple. Outside of that, expect speeds at around 10% slower at the low end and similar at the much higher end beyond SLR of 3.5.
Of course, even 'ideal hulls' are seldom perfectly semi-circular and the total resistance also depends on many other things, such as the hull ends and even air resistance etc., but this gives a general idea of speed performance for such differing hull shapes, assuming all other factors are alike and comparable. On another aspect, the deeper V-hulls will also have more directional stability but in turn, be harder to tack—helpful for long trips but not for short tacking.
True V-hulls are seldom used for the center hull of a trimaran as they offer so little space. However, they have been used for easy-to-build catamarans and trimaran amas, for owners ready to accept the performance sacrifices noted above. However, the more box-hull can be justified for the sake of easy building. and at least offers more foot space than the narrow Vee'd for a main hull. [Deep, near vertical flat-sided hulls are also drier than Vee'd hulls and have more recently proven to have less wave drag].
Recent tests (2009) on a small prototype trimaran with this Box-hull form and flat bottom, demonstrated that performance can be surprisingly good and some of what is lost through increased wetted surface is indeed made up by the slimmer form. While this may not be true at low speeds (below say 4 kt), the flat of bottom may give enough dynamic lift over at least part of the hull length to offset the theoretically greater surface, and show that the higher speeds of a light trimaran will not be as adversely affected by this box form as one might first think.
Editors Note: For this reason, this simple-to-build form was chosen for the new W17 that has since proven to perform very well indeed. The added resistance at the very low end (say under 4 k) will still be there and will need some imaginative boat trimming and added light-wind sail area to overcome. But for a significant speed range above that, this boat, especially when built to design weight, is proving that the flat underbody surface can indeed offer a very clean running hull with some dynamic lift at higher speeds that some W17 owners are calling 'oiling', as it reportedly feels 'like the boat is running on oil'. Even with the very moderate cruising rig, a speed of 14.9 k has already been recorded (by GPS) in this mode, so this is impressive and promises to offer lots of fun. So for this particular design at least, the high end restriction of a boxy hard chine hull has been overcome by the relatively narrow hull, the flat of bottom and its low-rocker design profile. Compared to a round bilge, the box-hull also offers additional lateral resistance, so the dagger board wetted surface can be slightly reduced for another small speed gain.
"New articles, comments and references will be added periodically as new questions are answered and other info comes in relative to this subject, so you're invited to revisit and participate." —webmaster
"See the Copyright Information & Legal Disclaimer page for copyright info and use of ANY part of this text or article"
Looloo (left) and Lucky McGee enjoying the cruising lifestyle aboard Chincogan 52 Moonraker anchored at the mouth of the estuary at the south end of Ko Phra Thong after spending a couple of weeks at Ko Phayam.
The seafront of Cartagena in Colombia is the backdrop for two sailing vessels of different epochs and sharply contrasting character.
Against the sea wall Galeon Bucanero , a replica of a Spanish galleon of the seventeenth century is totally at home against the fortifications of this historically significant Spanish port city.
In the foreground Chincogan 52 Sole currently circumnavigating the globe stops over en route to Panama and the Society Islands.
Over the years I've received many wonderful photos of our boats from around the world. This one is an absolute classic. Many thanks to Mike and Sarah Mason for the shot.
The design optimization of ship hull form based on hydrodynamics theory and simulation-based design (SBD) technologies generally considers ship performance and energy efficiency performance as the design objective, which plays an important role in smart design and manufacturing of green ship. An optimal design of sustainable energy system requires multidisciplinary tools to build ships with the least resistance and energy consumption. Through a systematic approach, this paper presents the research progress of energy-efficient design of ship hull forms based on intelligent optimization techniques. We discuss different methods involved in the optimization procedure, especially the latest developments of intelligent optimization algorithms and surrogate models. Moreover, current development trends and technical challenges of multidisciplinary design optimization and surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms for ship design are further analyzed. We explore the gaps and potential future directions, so as to pave the way toward the design of the next generation of more energy-efficient ship hull form.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
Optimization design of novel afterbody shape for a cruise ship, explore related subjects.
No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Trivyza, N. L., Rentizelas, A., Theotokatos, G., & Boulougouris, E. (2022). Decision support methods for sustainable ship energy systems: A state-of-the-art review. Energy, 239 , 122288.
Article Google Scholar
Frangopoulos, C. A. (2020). Developments, trends, and challenges in optimization of ship energy systems. Applied Sciences, 10 , 4639.
Esmailian, E., Gholami, H., Røstvik, H. N., & Menhaj, M. B. (2019). A novel method for optimal performance of ships by simultaneous optimisation of hull-propulsion-bipv systems. Energy Conversion and Management, 197 , 111879.
Tadros, M., Ventura, M., & Guedes Soares, C. (2023). Review of the decision support methods used in optimizing ship hulls towards improving energy efficiency. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11 , 835.
Chi, Y., & Huang, F. (2016). An overview of simulation-based hydrodynamic design of ship hull forms. Journal of Hydrodynamics. Ser. B, 28 , 947–960.
Google Scholar
Diez, M., Campana, E. F., & Stern, F. (2018). Stochastic optimization methods for ship resistance and operational efficiency via cfd. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 57 , 735–758.
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
Zhang, S., Tezdogan, T., Zhang, B., Xu, L., & Lai, Y. (2018). Hull form optimisation in waves based on cfd technique. Ships and Offshore Structures, 13 , 149–164.
Lin, Y., Yang, Q., & Guan, G. (2019). Automatic design optimization of swath applying cfd and rsm model. Ocean Engineering, 172 , 146–154.
Miao, A., Zhao, M., & Wan, D. (2020). Cfd-based multi-objective optimisation of s60 catamaran considering demihull shape and separation. Applied Ocean Research, 97 , 102071.
Nazemian, A., & Ghadimi, P. (2022). Multi-objective optimization of ship hull modification based on resistance and wake field improvement: combination of adjoint solver and cad-cfd-based approach. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 44 , 1–27.
Islam, H., Ventura, M., Soares, C. G., Tadros, M. & Abdelwahab, H. (2022). Comparison between empirical and cfd based methods for ship resistance and power prediction. Trends in Maritime Technology and Engineering, 347–357.
Zhang, B., & Zhang, S. (2019). Research on ship design and optimization based on simulation-based design (SBD) Technique . Springer.
Book Google Scholar
Larson, J., Menickelly, M., & Wild, S. M. (2019). Derivative-free optimization methods. Acta Numerica, 28 , 287–404.
Serani, A., et al. (2016). Ship hydrodynamic optimization by local hybridization of deterministic derivative-free global algorithms. Applied Ocean Research, 59 , 115–128.
Zhao, Z., Liu, S., Zhou, M., You, D., & Guo, X. (2022). Heuristic scheduling of batch production processes based on petri nets and iterated greedy algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 19 , 251–261.
Zhao, Z., Zhou, M., & Liu, S. (2022). Iterated greedy algorithms for flow-shop scheduling problems: A tutorial. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 19 , 1941–1959.
Esmailian, E., Steen, S., & Koushan, K. (2022). Ship design for real sea states under uncertainty. Ocean Engineering, 266 , 113127.
Hu, F., et al. (2022). Conceptual design of a long-range autonomous underwater vehicle based on multidisciplinary optimization framework. Ocean Engineering, 248 , 110684.
Zhu, M., Hahn, A., Wen, Y.-Q., & Sun, W.-Q. (2019). Optimized support vector regression algorithm-based modeling of ship dynamics. Applied Ocean Research, 90 , 101842.
Qian, J., Mao, X., Wang, X., et al. (2012). Ship hull automated optimization of minimum resistance via cfd and rsm technique. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 16 , 36–43.
Kim, H., Choi, J., & Chun, H. (2016). Hull-form optimization using parametric modification functions and particle swarm optimization. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 21 , 129–144.
Hou, Y., You, Y., & Liang, X. (2017). Minimum resistance ship hull uncertainty optimization design based on simulation-based design method. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 22 , 657–663.
Viana, F. A., Gogu, C. & Goel, T. (2021). Surrogate modeling: tricks that endured the test of time and some recent developments. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 1–28.
Tezdogan, T., et al. (2018). An investigation into fishing boat optimisation using a hybrid algorithm. Ocean Engineering, 167 , 204–220.
He, P., Filip, G., Martins, J. R., & Maki, K. J. (2019). Design optimization for self-propulsion of a bulk carrier hull using a discrete adjoint method. Computers & Fluids, 192 , 104259.
Zhang, S., Zhang, B., Tezdogan, T., Xu, L., & Lai, Y. (2018). Computational fluid dynamics-based hull form optimization using approximation method. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 12 , 74–88.
Zong, Z., Hong, Z., Wang, Y., & Hefazi, H. (2018). Hull form optimization of trimaran using self-blending method. Applied Ocean Research, 80 , 240–247.
Guan, G., Yang, Q., Wang, Y., Zhou, S., & Zhuang, Z. (2021). Parametric design and optimization of swath for reduced resistance based on evolutionary algorithm. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 26 , 54–70.
Luo, W., Guo, X., Dai, J., & Rao, T. (2021). Hull optimization of an underwater vehicle based on dynamic surrogate model. Ocean Engineering, 230 , 109050.
Yang, Q., Lin, Y., & Guan, G. (2020). Improved sequential sampling for meta-modeling promotes design optimization of swath. Ocean Engineering, 198 , 106958.
Huang, F., & Chi, Y. (2016). Hull form optimization of a cargo ship for reduced drag. Journal of Hydrodynamics. Ser. B, 28 , 173–183.
Coppedè, A., Gaggero, S., Vernengo, G., & Villa, D. (2019). Hydrodynamic shape optimization by high fidelity cfd solver and gaussian process based response surface method. Applied Ocean Research, 90 , 101841.
Rafiee, A., Haase, M., & Malcolm, A. (2022). Multi-objective bayesian hull form optimisation for high-speed craft. Ocean Engineering, 266 , 112688.
Liu, X., Wan, D., & Lei, L. (2023). Multi-fidelity model and reduced-order method for comprehensive hydrodynamic performance optimization and prediction of jbc ship. Ocean Engineering, 267 , 113321.
Villa, D., Furcas, F., Pralits, J. O., Vernengo, G., & Gaggero, S. (2021). An effective mesh deformation approach for hull shape design by optimization. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9 , 1107.
Çelik, C., Danışman, D. B., Khan, S., & Kaklis, P. (2021). A reduced order data-driven method for resistance prediction and shape optimization of hull vane. Ocean Engineering, 235 , 109406.
Wu, J., Liu, X., Zhao, M., & Wan, D. (2017). Neumann-michell theory-based multi-objective optimization of hull form for a naval surface combatant. Applied Ocean Research, 63 , 129–141.
Liu, X., Zhao, W., & Wan, D. (2021). Hull form optimization based on calm-water wave drag with or without generating bulbous bow. Applied Ocean Research, 116 , 102861.
Liu, Z., Zhao, W., & Wan, D. (2022). Resistance and wake distortion optimization of jbc considering ship-propeller interaction. Ocean Engineering, 244 , 110376.
Ao, Y., Duan, H., & Li, S. (2024). An integrated-hull design assisted by artificial intelligence-aided design method. Computers & Structures, 297 , 107320.
Peng, C., Huang, X., Wu, Y., & Kang, J. (2022). Constrained multi-objective optimization for uav-enabled mobile edge computing: Offloading optimization and path planning. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 11 , 861–865.
Wang, S., Duan, F., Li, Y., Xia, Y., & Li, Z. (2022). An improved radial basis function for marine vehicle hull form representation and optimization. Ocean Engineering, 260 , 112000.
Yang, L., Li, S.-Z., Zhao, F., & Ni, Q.-J. (2018). An integrated optimization design of a fishing ship hullform at different speeds. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 30 , 1174–1181.
Ni, Q., Ruan, W., Li, S., & Zhao, F. (2020). Multiple speed integrated optimization design for a swath using sbd technique. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 25 , 185–195.
Li, S., Zhu, F., Hou, X. & Ni, Q. (2022). Application of mesh deformation and adaptive method in hullform design optimization. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 1–10.
Hamed, A. (2022). Multi-objective optimization method of trimaran hull form for resistance reduction and propeller intake flow improvement. Ocean Engineering, 244 , 110352.
Wang, P., Chen, Z., & Feng, Y. (2021). Many-objective optimization for a deep-sea aquaculture vessel based on an improved rbf neural network surrogate model. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 26 , 582–605.
Zha, L., Zhu, R., Hong, L., & Huang, S. (2021). Hull form optimization for reduced calm-water resistance and improved vertical motion performance in irregular head waves. Ocean Engineering, 233 , 109208.
Cheng, X., Feng, B., Liu, Z., & Chang, H. (2018). Hull surface modification for ship resistance performance optimization based on delaunay triangulation. Ocean Engineering, 153 , 333–344.
Ichinose, Y. (2022). Method involving shape-morphing of multiple hull forms aimed at organizing and visualizing the propulsive performance of optimal ship designs. Ocean Engineering, 263 , 112355.
D’Agostino, D., Serani, A., & Diez, M. (2020). Design-space assessment and dimensionality reduction: An off-line method for shape reparameterization in simulation-based optimization. Ocean Engineering, 197 , 106852.
Zheng, Q., Feng, B.-W., Chang, H.-C., & Liu, Z.-Y. (2021). Dynamic space reduction optimization framework and its application in hull form optimization. Applied Ocean Research, 114 , 102812.
Khan, S., Kaklis, P., Serani, A., Diez, M., & Kostas, K. (2022). Shape-supervised dimension reduction: Extracting geometry and physics associated features with geometric moments. Computer-Aided Design, 150 , 103327.
Liu, X., Zhao, W., & Wan, D. (2021). Linear reduced order method for design-space dimensionality reduction and flow-field learning in hull form optimization. Ocean Engineering, 237 , 109680.
Qiang, Z., Bai-Wei, F., Zu-Yuan, L., Hai-Chao, C., & Xiao, W. (2022). Optimization method for hierarchical space reduction method and its application in hull form optimization. Ocean Engineering, 262 , 112108.
Diez, M., Campana, E. F., & Stern, F. (2015). Design-space dimensionality reduction in shape optimization by karhunen-loève expansion. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 283 , 1525–1544.
Serani, A., Stern, F., Campana, E. F., & Diez, M. (2022). Hull-form stochastic optimization via computational-cost reduction methods. Engineering with Computers, 38 , 2245–2269.
Chen, X., et al. (2015). High-fidelity global optimization of shape design by dimensionality reduction, metamodels and deterministic particle swarm. Engineering Optimization, 47 , 473–494.
Diez, M., He, W., Campana, E. F., & Stern, F. (2014). Uncertainty quantification of delft catamaran resistance, sinkage and trim for variable froude number and geometry using metamodels, quadrature and karhunen-loève expansion. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 19 , 143–169.
Chang, H., et al. (2023). Research on the karhunen-loève transform method and its application to hull form optimization. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11 , 230.
Zhang, Y., Ma, N., Gu, X., & Shi, Q. (2024). Geometric space construction method combined of a spline-skinning based geometric variation method and pca dimensionality reduction for ship hull form optimization. Ocean Engineering, 302 , 117604.
Wang, P., Feng, Y., Chen, Z., & Dai, Y. (2023). Study of a hull form optimization system based on a gaussian process regression algorithm and an adaptive sampling strategy, part i: Single-objective optimization. Ocean Engineering, 279 , 114502.
Wang, P., Feng, Y., Chen, Z., & Dai, Y. (2023). Study of a hull form optimization system based on a gaussian process regression algorithm and an adaptive sampling strategy, part ii: Multi-objective optimization. Ocean Engineering, 286 , 115501.
Zhou, Z., & Zhu, S. (2018). Kernel-based multiobjective clustering algorithm with automatic attribute weighting. Soft Computing, 22 , 3685–3709.
Zhu, S., Xu, L., Goodman, E. D., & Lu, Z. (2022). A new many-objective evolutionary algorithm based on generalized pareto dominance. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 52 , 7776–7790.
Zhu, S., & Xu, L. (2018). Many-objective fuzzy centroids clustering algorithm for categorical data. Expert Systems with Applications, 96 , 230–248.
Zhu, S., Xu, L., & Goodman, E. D. (2020). Evolutionary multi-objective automatic clustering enhanced with quality metrics and ensemble strategy. Knowledge-Based Systems, 188 (105018), 1–21.
Zhu, S., Xu, L., & Goodman, E. D. (2022). Hierarchical topology-based cluster representation for scalable evolutionary multiobjective clustering. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 52 , 9846–9860.
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: Nsga-ii. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6 , 182–197.
Zhang, Q., & Li, H. (2007). Moea/d: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 11 , 712–731.
Coello, C. A. C., Pulido, G. T., & Lechuga, M. S. (2004). Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 8 , 256–279.
Deb, K., & Jain, H. (2013). An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part i: solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 18 , 577–601.
Liu, X., Zhao, W., & Wan, D. (2022). Multi-fidelity co-kriging surrogate model for ship hull form optimization. Ocean Engineering, 243 , 110239.
Wen, Q., Feng, R., An, X., Chen, Y., & Huang, H. (2022). Optimal design of an autonomous underwater helicopter’s shape based on combinatorial optimization strategy. Ocean Engineering, 266 , 113015.
Yang, M., Wang, Y., Liang, Y., & Wang, C. (2022). A new approach to system design optimization of underwater gliders. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 27 , 3494–3505.
Huang, F., Wang, L., & Yang, C. (2016). A new improved artificial bee colony algorithm for ship hull form optimization. Engineering Optimization, 48 , 672–686.
Wang, P., Wang, F., Chen, Z., & Dai, Y. (2021). Aerodynamic optimization of a luxury cruise ship based on a many-objective optimization system. Ocean Engineering, 236 , 109438.
Zhang, S. (2022). Research on the deep learning technology in the hull form optimization problem. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10 , 1735.
Wu, J.-H., Zhen, X.-W., Liu, G., & Huang, Y. (2021). Uncertain multidisciplinary design optimization on next generation subsea production system by using surrogate model and interval method. China Ocean Engineering, 35 , 609–621.
Diez, M., & Peri, D. (2010). Robust optimization for ship conceptual design. Ocean Engineering, 37 , 966–977.
Wei, X., Chang, H., Feng, B., Liu, Z., & Huang, C. (2019). Hull form reliability-based robust design optimization combining polynomial chaos expansion and maximum entropy method. Applied Ocean Research, 90 , 101860.
Serani, A., et al. (2016). Parameter selection in synchronous and asynchronous deterministic particle swarm optimization for ship hydrodynamics problems. Applied Soft Computing, 49 , 313–334.
Cheng, X., Feng, B., Chang, H., Liu, Z., & Zhan, C. (2019). Multi-objective optimisation of ship resistance performance based on cfd. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 24 , 152–165.
Skoupas, S., Zaraphonitis, G., & Papanikolaou, A. (2019). Parametric design and optimisation of high-speed ro-ro passenger ships. Ocean Engineering, 189 , 106346.
Wan, Y., et al. (2022). Interval optimization design of a submersible surface ship form considering the uncertainty of surrogate model. Ocean Engineering, 263 , 112262.
Miao, A., & Wan, D. (2020). Hull form optimization based on an nm+ cfd integrated method for kcs. International Journal of Computational Methods, 17 , 2050008.
Guan, G., Zhuang, Z., Yang, Q., Wang, P., & Jin, S. (2022). Hull form optimization design of swath with combination evaluations of resistance and seakeeping performance. Ocean Engineering, 264 , 112513.
Guo, J., Zhang, Y., Chen, Z., & Feng, Y. (2020). Cfd-based multi-objective optimization of a waterjet-propelled trimaran. Ocean Engineering, 195 , 106755.
Jung, Y.-W., & Kim, Y. (2019). Hull form optimization in the conceptual design stage considering operational efficiency in waves. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 233 , 745–759.
Feng, Y., et al. (2018). Multidisciplinary optimization of an offshore aquaculture vessel hull form based on the support vector regression surrogate model. Ocean Engineering, 166 , 145–158.
Mao, Y., Wang, T., Duan, M., & Men, H. (2022). Multi-objective optimization of semi-submersible platforms based on a support vector machine with grid search optimized mixed kernels surrogate model. Ocean Engineering, 260 , 112077.
Liu, X., Yuan, Q., Zhao, M., Cui, W., & Ge, T. (2017). Multiple objective multidisciplinary design optimization of heavier-than-water underwater vehicle using cfd and approximation model. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 22 , 135–148.
Lin, Y., He, J., & Li, K. (2018). Hull form design optimization of twin-skeg fishing vessel for minimum resistance based on surrogate model. Advances in Engineering Software, 123 , 38–50.
Mittendorf, M., & Papanikolaou, A. D. (2021). Hydrodynamic hull form optimization of fast catamarans using surrogate models. Ship Technology Research, 68 , 14–26.
Tian, X., et al. (2021). Multi-objective optimization of the hull form for the semi-submersible medical platform. Ocean Engineering, 230 , 109038.
Alam, K., Ray, T., & Anavatti, S. G. (2015). Design optimization of an unmanned underwater vehicle using low-and high-fidelity models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 47 , 2794–2808.
Pellegrini, R., et al. (2017). Formulation and parameter selection of multi-objective deterministic particle swarm for simulation-based optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 58 , 714–731.
Zakerdoost, H., & Ghassemi, H. (2019). A multi-level optimization technique based on fuel consumption and energy index in early-stage ship design. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 59 , 1417–1438.
Jiang, C., Yang, S., Nie, P., & Xiang, X. (2023). Multi-objective structural profile optimization of ships based on improved artificial bee colony algorithm and structural component library. Ocean Engineering, 283 , 115124.
Chen, H., Li, W., Cui, W., Yang, P., & Chen, L. (2021). Multi-objective multidisciplinary design optimization of a robotic fish system. Journal of marine science and engineering, 9 , 478.
Nazemian, A., & Ghadimi, P. (2021). Cfd-based optimization of a displacement trimaran hull for improving its calm water and wavy condition resistance. Applied Ocean Research, 113 , 102729.
Tahara, Y., Peri, D., Campana, E. F., & Stern, F. (2008). Computational fluid dynamics-based multiobjective optimization of a surface combatant using a global optimization method. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 13 , 95–116.
Tahara, Y., Peri, D., Campana, E. F., & Stern, F. (2011). Single-and multiobjective design optimization of a fast multihull ship: numerical and experimental results. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 16 , 412–433.
Chang, H., Cheng, X., Liu, Z., Feng, B., & Zhan, C. (2016). Sample selection method for ship resistance performance optimization based on approximated model. Journal of Ship Research, 60 , 1–13.
Gaggero, S., Vernengo, G., & Villa, D. (2022). A marine propeller design method based on two-fidelity data levels. Applied Ocean Research, 123 , 103156.
Volpi, S., et al. (2015). Development and validation of a dynamic metamodel based on stochastic radial basis functions and uncertainty quantification. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 51 , 347–368.
Ouyang, X., et al. (2023). Application of an improved maximum entropy sampling method in hull form optimization. Ocean Engineering, 270 , 112702.
Ye, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2020). An optimal pointwise weighted ensemble of surrogates based on minimization of local mean square error. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 62 , 529–542.
Renaud, P., Sacher, M., & Scolan, Y.-M. (2022). Multi-objective hull form optimization of a swath configuration using surrogate models. Ocean Engineering, 256 , 111209.
Furcas, F., Vernengo, G., Villa, D., & Gaggero, S. (2020). Design of wake equalizing ducts using ranse-based sbdo. Applied Ocean Research, 97 , 102087.
Peri, D., Rossetti, M., & Campana, E. F. (2001). Design optimization of ship hulls via cfd techniques. Journal of Ship Research, 45 , 140–149.
Wang, S. & Kim, Y. (2024). Cfd-based hull optimization in calm water using adaptive grid deformation method. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 1–22.
Kang, Y., Pei, Z., Ao, L., & Wu, W. (2024). Reliability-based design optimization of river-sea-going ship based on agent model technology. Marine Structures, 94 , 103561.
Leotardi, C., Serani, A., Iemma, U., Campana, E. F., & Diez, M. (2016). A variable-accuracy metamodel-based architecture for global mdo under uncertainty. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 54 , 573–593.
Diez, M., et al. (2015). Multi-objective hydrodynamic optimization of the dtmb 5415 for resistance and seakeeping. In SNAME International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation , D021S005R012 (SNAME).
Li, S.-Z., Zhao, F., & Ni, Q.-J. (2014). Bow and stern shape integrated optimization for a full ship by a simulation-based design technique. Journal of Ship Research, 58 , 83–96.
Pellegrini, R., et al. (2022). A multi-fidelity active learning method for global design optimization problems with noisy evaluations. Engineering with Computers, 1–24.
Piazzola, C., et al. (2023). Comparing multi-index stochastic collocation and multi-fidelity stochastic radial basis functions for forward uncertainty quantification of ship resistance. Engineering with Computers, 39 , 2209–2237.
Pellegrini, R., et al. (2023). Multi-fidelity hydrodynamic analysis of an autonomous surface vehicle at surveying speed in deep water subject to variable payload. Ocean Engineering, 271 , 113529.
Goel, T., Haftka, R. T., Shyy, W., & Queipo, N. V. (2007). Ensemble of surrogates. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 33 , 199–216.
Zhang, D., Wang, Z., Ling, H., & Zhu, X. (2021). Kriging-based shape optimization framework for blended-wing-body underwater glider with nurbs-based parametrization. Ocean Engineering, 219 , 108212.
Hou, Y. H. (2017). Hull form uncertainty optimization design for minimum eeoi with influence of different speed perturbation types. Ocean Engineering, 140 , 66–72.
Zhang, S., Tezdogan, T., Zhang, B., & Lin, L. (2021). Research on the hull form optimization using the surrogate models. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 15 , 747–761.
Martins, J. R., & Lambe, A. B. (2013). Multidisciplinary design optimization: a survey of architectures. AIAA Journal, 51 , 2049–2075.
Li, H., Wei, X., Liu, Z., Feng, B., & Zheng, Q. (2023). Ship design optimization with mixed uncertainty based on evidence theory. Ocean Engineering, 279 , 114554.
Diez, M., Peri, D., Fasano, G. & Campana, E. F. (2010). Multidisciplinary robust optimization for ship design. In 28th symposium on naval hydrodynamic, Pasadena, Caloifornia, USA .
Guo, D., Jin, Y., Ding, J., & Chai, T. (2018). Heterogeneous ensemble-based infill criterion for evolutionary multiobjective optimization of expensive problems. IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 49 , 1012–1025.
Cui, M., Li, L., Zhou, M., & Abusorrah, A. (2022). Surrogate-assisted autoencoder-embedded evolutionary optimization algorithm to solve high-dimensional expensive problems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 26 , 676–689.
Jin, Y., Wang, H., Chugh, T., Guo, D., & Miettinen, K. (2018). Data-driven evolutionary optimization: An overview and case studies. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 23 , 442–458.
Liu, H., Ong, Y.-S., Shen, X., & Cai, J. (2020). When gaussian process meets big data: A review of scalable gps. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 31 , 4405–4423.
Cui, M., et al. (2022). A bi-population cooperative optimization algorithm assisted by an autoencoder for medium-scale expensive problems. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 9 , 1952–1966.
Wang, H., & Jin, Y. (2018). A random forest-assisted evolutionary algorithm for data-driven constrained multiobjective combinatorial optimization of trauma systems. IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 50 , 536–549.
Bhattacharjee, D., Ghosh, T., Bhola, P., Martinsen, K., & Dan, P. K. (2019). Data-driven surrogate assisted evolutionary optimization of hybrid powertrain for improved fuel economy and performance. Energy, 183 , 235–248.
Yuan, Q., Ye, Y., Tang, Y., Liu, Y., & Strbac, G. (2022). A novel deep-learning based surrogate modeling of stochastic electric vehicle traffic user equilibrium in low-carbon electricity-transportation nexus. Applied Energy, 315 , 118961.
Zhou, M., et al. (2024). Evolutionary optimization methods for high-dimensional expensive problems: A survey. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 11 , 1092–1105.
Zhou, Z., et al. (2024). Indicator designing for performance evaluation of collision avoidance algorithms programs on autonomous ships. Ocean Engineering, 295 , 116810.
Wang, N., Song, J. & Dong, Q. (2024). Structural design of a wave-adaptive unmanned quadramaran with independent suspension. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems .
Download references
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62206113 and 62073155), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant Nos. BK20221067 and BK20230923), and in part by the High-End Foreign Expert Recruitment Plan (Grant No. G2023144007L).
Authors and affiliations.
School of Artificial Intelligence and Computer, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China
Shuwei Zhu, Ning Sun, Siying Lv, Kaifeng Chen & Wei Fang
Innovation Center of Yangtze River Delta, Zhejiang University, Jiashan, 314100, China
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Shuwei Zhu wrote the main manuscript text, Ning Sun and Siying Lv prepared figures 1–6, Kaifeng Chen and Leilei Cao checked the English editing, and Shuwei Zhu and Wei Fang provided funding. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Correspondence to Shuwei Zhu or Wei Fang .
Conflict of interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
Zhu, S., Sun, N., Lv, S. et al. Research progress on intelligent optimization techniques for energy-efficient design of ship hull forms. J Membr Comput (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41965-024-00169-6
Download citation
Received : 09 May 2024
Accepted : 31 July 2024
Published : 28 August 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s41965-024-00169-6
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Advertisement
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser .
Discussion in ' Boat Design ' started by BayouDude , Feb 22, 2005 .
I am taking a course at the University of New Orleans and am going to design a power trimaran. I would like to do something about 80-100 foot with a 20-30ft beam, a range of 1000 miles and a cruising speed of 20kts. I was thinking the vessel would be used for a live aboard dive boat or possibly a yacht. I was intrigued by the trimaran hull and was wondering if anyone had any suggestions? Any input would be appreciated.
You should look at Nigel Irens designs.
What might be your motivation to choose for the power tri concept? Any mono would feed with ease your bill of requirements. The power tri, in its true concept, is just to achieve speeds normally unobtainable by monohulls. If you are looking for the wide-bodied designs you better go for the cat design. I play a bit around with tri-designs, actually winged monohulls, to go fast, stable and with a minimum of draft that allows you to enter shallow waters. Beachable too.
I did some work a few years ago with a concerp of a tri Patrol boat. There was a large gain in deck work area however the seakeeping limited it's operation. If it's a fair weather fun boat probably work out just fine.
Thanks for the input. I have just taken a look at some of Nigel Irens designs and they are impressive. I have decided on the trimaran because the class focuses on cats, tris and surface effect ships. Most of my experience is in tugs and offshore supply vessels so this high speed stuff is somewhat new. I would prefer to do something other than a monohull even though the benefits offered by a trimaran for this size and speed may not be exceptional.
BayouDude said: cats, tris and surface effect ships. Click to expand...
Drawings and ideas. Throw on some drawings please!
A liberal is forward thinking and the only way to be... politically To not be a liberal when your 18 means you have no heart, to not be consirtive when your 40 means you have NO head!! Old frog saying, FAST FRED
Caveat Emptor........
I believe a trimaran is a wonderfull choice, a multi hull boat was my first creation. just some advise fom a previouse design of mine: if you are gouing to have a center board instead of a fixed keel it is very conveniant to run it through a table below deck. this way it gives the table added suport and keeps it out of your way
i just started building a power tri will keep you'll updated
Tri Hull power yacht BayouDude said: I am taking a course at the University of New Orleans and am going to design a power trimaran. I would like to do something about 80-100 foot with a 20-30ft beam, a range of 1000 miles and a cruising speed of 20kts. I was thinking the vessel would be used for a live aboard dive boat or possibly a yacht. I was intrigued by the trimaran hull and was wondering if anyone had any suggestions? Any input would be appreciated. Click to expand...
Tri hull.jpg.
From brian eiland's second link: http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/trimaran/ ADVANTAGES OF TRIMARAN DESIGN The advantages of a trimaran hullform over conventional mono-hulls are thought to be: reduced costs, reduced signature, significantly less drag increased speed, increased length, giving greater stability, and more room for the upper deck, which could be used for the flight deck as well as hangars for helicopters and extra armaments. Click to expand...
Radar signature depends very much on the shape and material of that hull. 90-degree angles are very good radar reflectors; stealth aircraft usually use a lot of 48-degree angles to minimize signature. Metals generally reflect more than composites. The shape of a boat is so complex that it's hard to predict radar signature without an actual test range. Having said that, if you suspect your vessel's radar signature is small (often the case with thin composite-hulled boats) it is prudent to hoist a reflector.
Reduced cost......could of meant "reduced operating cost". That is to say for faster speeds it consumes less fuel - I guess. 48-degree angles to minimize signature Click to expand...
Two new superyacht power trimarans.
Ewf b.v east west forwarding.
Edelveis, Right Entrance, 2nd Floor Davidkovskaja, 121352 Moscow, Russia
Enter the security code:
+7 495 938-99-67
+7 495-997-0977
+7 495 938-99-66
Directory of Freight Forwarders, Cargo Agents, Shipping Companies, Air, Ocean, Land, Logistics and Transportation Brokers
Posted June 24, 2021 in Brokerage & New Build by Janine St.Denis
The 198-foot (60.35m) Feadship superyacht BLUE MOON is now listed for sale with Northrop & Johnson Yacht Brokers Kevin Merrigan and Wes Sanford. The yacht is listed for €43,900,000.
BLUE MOON is a truly remarkable superyacht. She was launched by Feadship in 2005, but has benefitted from constant and consistent upgrades, updates and care throughout her life courtesy of her adoring owner and her professional long-time crew. Some of her most recent modifications include a full superstructure repaint in 2018, the upgrade of her Quantum Zero Speed stabilizers to XT fin-type in 2019 and the repaint of her hull and main-deck bulwarks in 2021. The yacht’s interior and exterior both were designed by the renowned Donald Starkey. As such, BLUE MOON has won a variety of awards throughout her life, including “Best full-displacement motor yacht over 56 meters” at the 2006 ShowBoats Awards, among others.
In addition to providing the perfect on-water sanctuary for her owners, this pedigreed luxury motor yacht also has enjoyed a successful charter following. BLUE MOON’s exceptional features are certainly a draw. The yacht has a glass all-decks elevator, an observation lounge that provides sweeping views and a unique and flexible accommodations layout that can cater to almost any type of charter requirement. Furthermore, her on-deck master suite is expansive. At 1,200 square feet, it is no wonder this suite has space for a bedroom, his-and-hers en-suite bathroom, full owner’s office and a private gymnasium. The five additional staterooms, all with en-suite bathrooms, located on the lower deck can be converted to create a three-, four- or five-stateroom layout. This lower deck has an additional gym for guest use.
BLUE MOON features traditional interior styling with comfortable amenities that will delight guests. Various lounge spaces, bars, dining tables and entertainment options are found throughout the yacht. On deck, the yacht provides alfresco dining, a Jacuzzi, sunpads, a swim platform and so much more.
Proud to be part of the MarineMax family
© 2024 Northrop & Johnson
The owner's first Feadship experience was a two-week cruise on September Blue in the mid-1990s. An immediate convert, he soon bought the 47.50m Mi Gaea , which was renamed Blue Moon . Not long after, the designs for a brand-new Feadship were on the table and the second Blue Moon - at 50.28m the largest aluminium Feadship ever built at the time - was launched in 2000. The third Blue Moon was launched in 2005.
Accommodation, entertainment, more feadships.
Pilot newsletter signup.
This site uses some unobtrusive cookies to store information on your computer. These cookies are essential to make our site work and help us to optimize your experience by giving us insight into how the site is being used. By continuing to use this website you give "implied" consent for these cookies to be stored.
The global authority in superyachting
BLUE MOON is a 60.35 m Motor Yacht, built in Netherlands by Feadship and delivered in 2005.
Her top speed is 16.0 kn and she boasts a maximum range of 4700.0 nm when navigating at cruising speed, with power coming from two Caterpillar diesel engines. She can accommodate up to 12 guests in 6 staterooms, with 15 crew members. She has a gross tonnage of 1102.0 GT and a 11.1 m beam.
She was designed by Donald Starkey , who also designed the interior. Donald Starkey has designed 34 yachts and designed the interior of 57 yachts for yachts above 24 metres.
The naval architecture was developed by Feadship De Voogt Naval Architects , who has architected 104 other superyachts in the BOAT Pro database - she is built with a Teak deck, a Steel hull, and Aluminium superstructure.
BLUE MOON is in the top 5% by LOA in the world. She is one of 206 motor yachts in the 60-70m size range.
BLUE MOON is currently sailing under the Cayman Islands flag, the 2nd most popular flag state for superyachts with a total of 1414 yachts registered. She is known to be an active superyacht and has most recently been spotted cruising near Greece. For more information regarding BLUE MOON's movements, find out more about BOATPro AIS .
Yachts like this, from our partners, sponsored listings.
Find anything, super fast.
Motor Yacht
Launched in 2005, the 60.35 metre superyacht Blue Moon stands testament to meticulous design by Donald Starkey and expert construction by Feadship. Custom-built, this superyacht was refitted in 2008 and is ideal for sole-family use or perfect for long-journeys with charter guests.
With space on board for 12 guests, accommodation consists of a full-beam on-deck master suite, with office and guest room / gym, measuring approximately 1200 sq ft. The grand Owner’s suite is joined by two twin cabins connected to two queen cabins to offer a layout transformation from cabin to full suite. Her layout also provides space for 13 staff of highly skilled yacht crew and her Captain, making life on the water idyllic, down to the last detail.
Her glass cylinder elevator, large skylight in the sundeck, touch-and-go helicopter pad and updated 1972 Riva tender are just some of the design elements on board. This quintessential family boat benefits from the input of designer, builder and owner. Her interiors, also created by Donald Starkey, are a rich make-up of dark woods and light creams, expertly blended to create a stately home feel on the water.
Other feadship yachts, related news.
Contact agent.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
NEEL sailing trimarans changed that up a few years ago by introducing a significant amount of living space across a larger main hull and wider amas capable of accommodating full-sized cabins. The powertri has adopted this design and it offers an astounding amount of room. Above: The salon onboard the 2022 LEEM 56 TRIMARAN.
Austal are now approaching completion of their next generation trimaran, the Auto Express 102. Now in week 18 of construction, the 102 meter boat is due to launch in October. The bald facts are ...
Order the Latest Design Portfolio today to see over 85 multihull plans in stock.Besides illustrating my stock designs, for which I sell study plans and full construction plans, it also contains my design philosophy of multihulls; an article on the rapid Cylinder Mold(pdf) or Cylinder-molding (in html) multihull construction; examples of drawing sets; photographs; fact sheets with dimensions ...
Long Range Power Trimaran Concept Paper The dream of letting slip the lines and heading off over the horizon to exotic locations is shared by many who love boating and the outdoors. For too long however, people have been forced to choose between ... Hull design can "dry out" in tidal areas reducing the need for specialist dry dock facilities
Power Multihulls. These low-drag powerboats give a much better ride and require far less power than other types for target speeds of up to 2.5 to 3.0 times the vessel's hull speed. Excellent economy, a superior ride, and a more extensive cruising range are possible with these displacement multihulls. Some of those catamaran powerboats are ...
Ed Horstman designed TRIMARAN and CATAMARAN plans are drawn for the first time builder. Plans are concise and clearly drawn so the builder can easily follow each building step. ... with the exception of the TRI 25, TRI 26MT, CAT 27PC and the CAT 27. A DESIGN FEE for customer modifications to stock plans. TRI-STAR 18. Click for complete details ...
In a 5 cabin layout, the LEEN 56 can accommodate up to 11 passengers. The quality furniture is designed in light coloured wood and made by quality cabinetmakers. The layout and fixtures of the outdoor areas (cockpit and flybridge) are left to the buyer's desire. The flybridge is accessed from the cockpit via an external staircase.
The 210 Sunreef Power Trimaran is the avant-garde of superyacht design and the ultimate expression of engineering expertise. An ambitious 210ft three-hulled concept, it fully utilizes the space within and between the hulls to reach a living area of nearly 1000m². The vessel's outdoor social area features an immense flybridge, a cockpit ...
A third number that we can plug in as a constant if we want to is the prismatic coefficient which describes bow much volume there is end the ends relative to the cross section shape in the middle of the boat, but in sailing boats this is of less importance compared to other factors. The hull lines for Design 256, 8.5m Cat.
The ultimate multihull design and building resource - catamarans and trimarans to 150 feet ... 38' power trimaran in composite and developed plywood - a "kayak mothership." ... 6.5 hp will push this tri at hull speed, the specified twin 15 hp outboards will push it along at over 12 knots. ...
However, the power catamaran is a relatively modern innovation that marries the traditional twin-hull design with powerful engines, offering a unique blend of speed, stability, and space. Distinguishing Design: Power Catamarans are characterized by their twin hulls, which significantly reduce the drag, thus enhancing speed and fuel efficiency.
Design, construction, and material information about small trimarans: Design Criteria, Construction Methods, Comparisons of Designs, Speed, Stability, and much more. Your sailing multihull DESIGN-INFO site for… Small Trimaran Information, Small Multihull Design, Design Issues, Construction Methods, Comparisons of Designs, Speed, Stability ...
This remarkable sailing trimaran stands out with its new innovative wave-piercing main hull design, ensuring smooth and efficient sailing. With a strong emphasis on easy handling and shorthanded sailing, the DRAGONFLY 36 is perfect for families and sailing enthusiasts alike.Step aboard and experience the spacious cockpit that invites relaxation and social interaction, complemented by a stylish ...
The outboard motors make beaching easier and safer - no rudders and engine legs. Two 40 to 60 HP engines guarantee a cruising speed of 10-12 knots (16-20 knots top speed). Architect: Richard Woods Design. Material: Epoxy plywood. Overall length: 30'2" (9.20m) Waterline length: 289' (8.85 m) Beam: 16'5" (5.00 m) Draft: 14" (0.36 m)
As noted above, the Froude Speed/Length ratio is very significant in boat design. Most descriptions and findings re hull resistance are directly related to it. For example it has been shown that a displacement hull creates a wave equal to its length at a S/L ratio of 1.34 and at that point, there's such a hump in the resistant curve that most ...
Recent tests (2009) on a small prototype trimaran with this Box-hull form and flat bottom, demonstrated that performance can be surprisingly good and some of what is lost through increased wetted surface is indeed made up by the slimmer form. While this may not be true at low speeds (below say 4 kt), the flat of bottom may give enough dynamic ...
sharpii2 Senior Member. The trimaran can have less wetted area than a catamaran. The reason for this is that the outer hulls (amas) can be made to do little more than act as training wheels, to keep the narrow main hull from tipping over. Double outriggers work on this principle, as do most modern sailing trimarans.
My aim is to do 8kts with less than 1kW. This requires an ambitious weight target but not impossible. The boat is intended to have both solar and wind energy collection, battery energy storage and electric motor propulsion. This hull form will achieve the best form stability you can get for a 7ft beam.
We design modern high performance sailing catamarans, trimarans and power cats. Contact us to find the right professionals and resources for your project, or to create a custom design to empower your vision for time on the water.
The design optimization of ship hull form based on hydrodynamics theory and simulation-based design (SBD) technologies generally considers ship performance and energy efficiency performance as the design objective, which plays an important role in smart design and manufacturing of green ship. An optimal design of sustainable energy system requires multidisciplinary tools to build ships with ...
The aircraft was totally destroyed by impact forces and debris were found on an area of 550 meters long and 80 meters wide. None of the 174 survived the crash. Among the passengers were 128 Russians, 38 Chileans, six Algerians, one East-German and one Australian. Up to date, this was the worse plane crash in History. The exact cause of the ...
I am taking a course at the University of New Orleans and am going to design a power trimaran. I would like to do something about 80-100 foot with a 20-30ft beam, a range of 1000 miles and a cruising speed of 20kts. I was thinking the vessel would be used for a live aboard dive boat or possibly a yacht.
EWF B.V EAST WEST FORWARDING. Edelveis, Right Entrance, 2nd Floor Davidkovskaja, 121352 Moscow, Russia. Phone: +7 495 938-99-66; Mobile: +7 495-997-0977
Refit & Services; About Feadship; News, press & events; The Feadship-family; About Blue Moon. The owner's first Feadship experience was a two-week cruise on September Blue in the
"Рязань 2017" is a motorcycle ride through Moscow, Moscow Oblast and Rjazan, Russia. A 467km (290mi) ride passing through Cherëmushki, Ryazan', Kolomna, Lyubertsy, Moscow, Bronnitsy and 9 other places.